5G – Pathophysiological Effects
SUMMARY
Credit : adapted from Martin Pall, et al work
We know that there is massive literature, providing a high level of scientific certainty, for each of eight pathophysiological effects caused by non-thermal microwave frequency EMF exposures.
This is shown in 12 to 35 reviews on each specific effect.
A substantial body of evidence on the existence of each effect.
Such EMFs :
a) Attack our nervous systems including our brains leading to widespread neurological/ neuropsychiatric effects and possibly many other effects. This nervous system attack is of great concern.
b) Attack our endocrine (that is hormonal) systems. In this context, the main things that make us functionally different from single celled creatures are our nervous system and our endocrine systems – even a simple planaria worm needs both of these. The consequences of the disruption of these two regulatory systems is immense.
c) Produce oxidative stress and free radical damage, which have central roles in essentially all chronic diseases.
d) Attack the DNA of our cells, producing single strand and double strand breaks in cellular DNA and oxidized bases in our cellular DNA. These in turn produce cancer and also mutations in germ line cells which produce mutations in future generations.
e) Produce elevated levels of apoptosis (programmed cell death), events especially important in causing both neurodegenerative diseases and infertility.
f) Lower male and female fertility, lower sex hormones, lower libido and increased levels of spontaneous abortion and, as already stated, attack the DNA in sperm cells.
g) Produce excessive intracellular calcium [Ca2+]i and excessive calcium signaling.
h) Attack the cells of our bodies to cause cancer. Such attacks are thought to act via 15 different mechanisms during cancer causation. There is also substantial literature showing that EMFs also cause other effects including life threatening cardiac effects.
i) In addition substantial evidence suggests EMF causation of very early onset dementias, including Alzheimer’s, digital and other types of dementias ; and there is evidence that EMF exposures in utero and shortly after birth can cause ADHD and autism
Each of these effects is produced via the main mechanism of action of microwave/lower frequency EMFs, activation of voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs)
Each of them is produced via what are called downstream effects of VGCC activation. It follows from this that we have a good understanding not only that these effects occur, but also how they can occur.
The extraordinary sensitivity of the VGCC voltage sensor to the forces of the EMFs tells us that the current safety guidelines allow us to be exposed to EMF levels that are something like 7.2 million times too high.
That sensitivity is predicted by the physics. Therefore, the physics and the biology are each pointing to the same mechanism of action of non-thermal EMFs.
The different effects produced are obviously very deep concerns. They become much deeper and become existential threats when one considers that several of these effects are both cumulative and eventually irreversible.
There is substantial evidence for the cumulative nature and eventual irreversibility of the neurological/neuropsychiatric effects, of the reproductive effects, the mutational DNA effects, the cardiac effects, of some but not other of the hormonal effects ; any causation of ADHD and autism may add additional concerns (here the cumulative nature is probably limited to the perinatal period).
When we know that sperm counts have dropped by more than 50% throughout the technologically advanced countries on earth, it is difficult to avoid the conclusion that the vast majority of the population in those countries is already substantially impacted.
The same conclusion can be made based on the widespread nature of the neuropsychiatric effects in those countries.
Both of those effects will get much much worse even with no increase in current exposures, due to the cumulative nature and irreversibility of these effects. I expect we will see crash in human reproduction almost to zero as happened in the Magras and Xenos mouse study which I estimate to occur within about 5 years, without any increases in our exposures.
Obviously 4G and 5G will make the situation much worse.
Similarly the deterioration in brain function that we are already seeing will seal our fate if we fail to act rapidly and vigorously.
All wireless communication devices put out polarized EMFs that carry information via pulsations are potentially health hazards.
Both the pulsations and the polarization make these EMFs much more biologically active.
Dr Golding’s recommendations to offset EMF cellular and dna damage include :
Resveratrol 500mg twice a day
Vit c 2g twice a day
Quatrefolic 1/d
Egcg 300mg twice a day
NAC 500mg twice a day
Thank you for the vital information. Your kind sharing of a protocol is much appreciated. I will endeavor to share this in targeted ways to endeavor to reach people who need it, and hope others will do the same. Meanwhile, I have a need for more of the direct evidence of harmful effects. If you could possibly send links the research, I’d appreciate it and will use it to get the truth out as effectively as possible.
This summary does a solid job compiling the research on VGCC activation as the central mechanism. What caught my eye was the claim about safety guidelines being 7.2 million times too high, which seems like a number that would get dismissed pretty quickly without more context on how that calculation works. I've seen similar debates in other RF exposure contexts where the biological effects literature and physics-based safety models talk past eachother completely. The part about cumulative irreversible effects is worth thinking through more carefully since most risk frameworks still assume linear dose-response curves.This summary does a solid job compiling the research on VGCC activation as the central mecahnism. The claim about safety guidelines being 7.2 million times too high caught my attention, though it needs more context to land with regulators who'll want the calculation methodology spelled out. I've been tracking similar debates around RF exposure where biological effects data and physics-based safety models basically operate in seperate universes. The cumulative irreversible effects angle is especially important given that most risk frameworks still lean on linear dose-response assumptions.This summary does a solid job compiling the research on VGCC activation as the central mecahnism. The claim about safety guidelines being 7.2 million times too high is a big number that needs more context to land with regulators who'll want the calculation methodology spelled out. I've been tracking similar debates around RF exposure where biological effects data and physics-based safety models basically operate in seperate universes. The cumulative irreversible effects angle is especially important given most risk frameworks still lean on linear dose-response assumptions.